{"id":"GHSA-f989-c77f-r2cq","summary":"Crawl4AI: LLM credential exfiltration in Docker server via request base_url and env: token resolution","details":"### Summary\n\nThe Docker API server let a request control where LLM calls were sent and which environment variable an LLM token resolved from. Both could be abused to exfiltrate server-held secrets. The Docker API is unauthenticated by default.\n\n### Vector 1 - attacker base_url\n\n`/md`, `/llm`, and `/llm/job` accepted a `base_url` in the request and used it as the LLM endpoint while still attaching the server's configured provider API key. An attacker set `base_url` to a server they control and received the provider key (and any provider keys the server holds) in the inbound request.\n\n### Vector 2 - arbitrary environment variable read via `env:`\n\n`LLMConfig(api_token=\"env:NAME\")` resolved `NAME` from the server environment with `os.getenv`. Because request bodies were deserialized into `LLMConfig` (via a crawler config / extraction strategy), an attacker could set `api_token=\"env:SECRET_KEY\"` (or `env:REDIS_PASSWORD`, etc.) and, paired with an attacker `base_url`, exfiltrate that secret. Reading the server's `SECRET_KEY` enables forging authentication tokens.\n\n### Impact\n\nDisclosure of LLM provider API keys and other server secrets to an attacker-controlled endpoint; reading the JWT `SECRET_KEY` can lead to authentication bypass.\n\n### Fix\n\n- The LLM endpoints ignore a request-supplied `base_url`; the endpoint is always derived server-side from the provider name. The field is still accepted but no longer honored (no breaking 4xx).\n- `LLMConfig` refuses `env:` resolution of protected environment-variable names (names containing SECRET/PASSWORD/PRIVATE, prefixes CRAWL4AI*/AWS_SECRET*, and SECRET_KEY/REDIS_PASSWORD/TOKEN). Normal provider keys (e.g. OPENAI_API_KEY) are unaffected.\n\n### Workarounds\n\n- Upgrade to the patched version.\n- Enable authentication (`CRAWL4AI_API_TOKEN`).\n- Do not place sensitive secrets in the server environment alongside provider keys.\n\n### Credits\n\n- Geo ([geo-chen](https://github.com/geo-chen)) - reported the LLM credential exfiltration via request base_url.\n- Internal security audit (Crawl4AI maintainers) - the env: arbitrary-variable read.","aliases":["CVE-2026-56259","PYSEC-2026-3448"],"modified":"2026-07-15T20:11:30.371628850Z","published":"2026-06-16T21:00:31Z","database_specific":{"github_reviewed_at":"2026-06-16T21:00:31Z","nvd_published_at":null,"cwe_ids":["CWE-200","CWE-522","CWE-918"],"severity":"HIGH","github_reviewed":true},"references":[{"type":"WEB","url":"https://github.com/unclecode/crawl4ai/security/advisories/GHSA-f989-c77f-r2cq"},{"type":"PACKAGE","url":"https://github.com/unclecode/crawl4ai"}],"affected":[{"package":{"name":"crawl4ai","ecosystem":"PyPI","purl":"pkg:pypi/crawl4ai"},"ranges":[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.8.8"}]}],"versions":["0.3.0","0.3.1","0.3.2","0.3.3","0.3.4","0.3.5","0.3.6","0.3.7","0.3.71","0.3.72","0.3.73","0.3.731","0.3.74","0.3.741","0.3.742","0.3.743","0.3.744","0.3.745","0.3.746","0.3.8","0.4.0","0.4.1","0.4.21","0.4.22","0.4.23","0.4.24","0.4.241","0.4.242","0.4.243","0.4.244","0.4.245","0.4.246","0.4.247","0.4.248","0.4.248b3","0.4.3b1","0.4.3b2","0.4.3b3","0.5.0","0.5.0.post1","0.5.0.post2","0.5.0.post3","0.5.0.post4","0.5.0.post5","0.5.0.post6","0.5.0.post7","0.5.0.post8","0.6.0","0.6.0rc1","0.6.1","0.6.2","0.6.3","0.7.0","0.7.1","0.7.2","0.7.3","0.7.4","0.7.5","0.7.6","0.7.7","0.7.8","0.8.0","0.8.5","0.8.6","0.8.7"],"database_specific":{"last_known_affected_version_range":"\u003c= 0.8.7","source":"https://github.com/github/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/github-reviewed/2026/06/GHSA-f989-c77f-r2cq/GHSA-f989-c77f-r2cq.json"}}],"schema_version":"1.9.0","severity":[{"type":"CVSS_V3","score":"CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N"}]}